StandardCriminal Law
Lesson 12 of 20
Working draft for principal review. Items marked "review" are legal-basis points written from memory and awaiting confirmation before release.
Module 3, Lesson 12

The letter to the court

One page in your own words, with the two parts that do the heavy lifting in a drug-driving matter.

Reading time 3 minCharge s 111 Road Transport Act 2013, first offenceApplies to NSW Local Court

12.1What the letter is evidence of

The letter is evidence of remorse and insight under s 10(3)(a) and of the extenuating and other circumstances under (c) and (d). Its evidentiary weight is modest and its risk is real: a letter that minimises, that argues impairment, or that contains a version of events inconsistent with the agreed facts damages the subjective case and can be put to the offender if they give evidence.

12.2The insight the court is looking for

For a presence offence the relevant insight is specific: that the offence is complete on presence, that the offender's own assessment of fitness to drive was not the legal test, and that the drug's persistence in the body was the thing the offender failed to account for. A letter that says this, in the offender's own words, answers the question a Judge is most likely to put from the bench, which is "do you understand that it does not matter whether you felt affected".

12.3The licence paragraph

The final paragraph states what the licence is used for and what its loss would mean, in concrete terms and with cross-reference to the supporting evidence in the folder (employer's letter, medical letter, a map of the distance to public transport). It does not ask for a s 10 in terms; the submissions do that. It closes with a sentence accepting whatever the court decides.

For the file

What a practitioner records at this stage

The letter reviewed for consistency with the facts sheet and for the absence of any impairment argument.